Clonal interference of signaling mutations worsens prognosis in core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia

R Itzykson, N Duployez, A Fasan… - Blood, The Journal …, 2018 - ashpublications.org
R Itzykson, N Duployez, A Fasan, G Decool, A Marceau-Renaut, M Meggendorfer…
Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology, 2018ashpublications.org
Mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase/RAS signaling pathway genes are frequent in core-
binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs), but their prognostic relevance is
debated. A subset of CBF AML patients harbors several signaling gene mutations.
Genotyping of colonies and of relapse samples indicates that these arise in independent
clones, thus defining a process of clonal interference (or parallel evolution). Clonal
interference is pervasive in cancers, but the mechanisms underlying this process remain …
Abstract
Mutations in receptor tyrosine kinase/RAS signaling pathway genes are frequent in core-binding factor (CBF) acute myeloid leukemias (AMLs), but their prognostic relevance is debated. A subset of CBF AML patients harbors several signaling gene mutations. Genotyping of colonies and of relapse samples indicates that these arise in independent clones, thus defining a process of clonal interference (or parallel evolution). Clonal interference is pervasive in cancers, but the mechanisms underlying this process remain unclear, and its prognostic impact remains unknown. We analyzed a cohort of 445 adult and pediatric patients with CBF AML treated with intensive chemotherapy and with deep sequencing of 6 signaling genes (KIT, NRAS, KRAS, FLT3, JAK2, CBL). A total of 152 (34%), 167 (38%), and 126 (28%) patients harbored no, a single, and multiple signaling clones (clonal interference), respectively. Clonal interference of signaling mutations was associated with older age (P = .004) and inv(16) subtype (P = .025) but not with white blood cell count or mutations in chromatin or cohesin genes. The median allele frequency of signaling mutations was 31% in patients with a single clone or clonal interference (P = .14). The repertoire of KIT, FLT3, and NRAS/KRAS variants differed between groups. Clonal interference did not affect complete remission rate or minimal residual disease after 1-2 courses, but it did convey inferior event-free survival (P < 10−4), whereas the presence of a single signaling clone did not (P = .44). This inferior outcome was independent of clinical parameters and of the presence of specific signaling clones. Our results suggest that specific clonal architectures can herald distinct prognoses in AML.
ashpublications.org